Three Tasmanian political figures have banded together to denounce the ongoing financial support for greyhound racing, urging an end to taxpayer subsidies for the industry. Independent candidate Peter George, along with Clark member Kristie Johnston and re-elected Nelson MLC Meg Webb, made a public statement at Kingston Beach’s ‘Salty Dog’ to voice their opposition to the substantial annual funding provided to greyhound racing.
The trio organized a symbolic foreshore walk to emphasize the public’s disapproval of the millions of dollars allocated to the greyhound sector each year. Their primary objective is to push for a gradual phasing out of the industry, particularly with the current funding agreement set to expire in 2028-29.
Reflecting on his past experience as a reporter covering greyhound racing in the 70s, George highlighted the industry’s long-standing welfare and gambling concerns that have persisted over the decades. He emphasized the lack of justification for continued government subsidies to an industry that lacks widespread public support.
Johnston, a vocal opponent of greyhound racing since her election in 2021, echoed the sentiment that Tasmanians are unwilling to see their tax dollars funneled into an industry that raises ethical and welfare issues. Both she and George urged voters to consider candidates’ stances on greyhound racing funding ahead of the upcoming state election on July 19.
In contrast, TasRacing and government officials have defended the greyhound industry, citing its purported positive impact on the community. TasRacing reported a 6% increase in greyhound wagering from the previous year, while the Liberal party has affirmed its support for the industry, ruling out any plans to ban greyhound racing.
Johnston urged voters to scrutinize candidates’ positions on greyhound racing funding as a critical factor in their electoral decisions. She emphasized the importance of electing representatives who align with public sentiment against the greyhound racing sector.
As the debate over greyhound racing subsidies continues to unfold, the calls for a reevaluation of taxpayer support for the industry underscore broader concerns about ethical practices, animal welfare, and public accountability in the realm of sports and entertainment.
The united front presented by these independents signals a growing movement towards increased transparency and accountability in government funding for industries that face mounting ethical and social scrutiny. Their advocacy reflects a broader shift towards prioritizing public interests and values in shaping legislative priorities and resource allocation.
📰 Related Articles
- Report Reveals Taxpayer Burden of Tasmanian Greyhound Racing
- Economist Critiques Tasmania’s Greyhound Racing Subsidies Impact
- ZiMAD and The Hunger Project Unite Against World Hunger
- Victoria’s Greyhound Racing Season Revamped for 2025/26
- University Rank-and-File Committees Unite Against Labor’s Education Cuts